fiddler,

The profs site is like that because of all the visitors there.  It has to do with the fact that cgi boards like prof can't handle the sheer number of visitors like mostly html boards like Jade.  Jade only uses cgi for new posts, while FGB uses cgi for everything.

To delete posts through FGB, the administrative password is:
punipuni

Rest assured that there are plenty of others who also delete posts there, so if we all take it easy and delete posts whenever we pass by, it should be kept in good condition. ;)

For reposting at Jade, it's very similar to the way to repost FGB.  In actuality, it is now much easier to repost Jade, although you cannot get the perfect mirror like before.  Instead of getting the source code, highlight all the text at Jade and put it into Editpad.  Then replace all \n\n with \n.  What this will do is neatly separate each post by a single return.  I then replace all \n\n with \n---\n which will throw in --- between each line.  I'm thinking of instead replacing \n\n by \n\n---\n\n so that it will have more spaces inbetween.  Then it would look identical to a html repost except instead of hr there would be ---.  No need to deal with h3 or anything like that because you are only highlighting what appears and h3 doesn't appear.

It's most likely that the script for Jade itself was changed, so using the previous posting page probably won't work.  However, I can check since I also have a copy of the old posting page.


Should I then post new updates to paracyprichromis.htm then?

peeper is not someone to be trusted, so I'd be careful doing anything with him. ;)

I have nothing personal against him myself, but in the past he has been a pathological liar and often delusional.

As for peeper and Casa, I would not accept what peeper says too quickly.  As an example of what I said, peeper once said he had Lightbringer's Ip and that peeper had gotten it from FGB Fast Chat.  I told Lightbringer that peeper was lying as usual and told the same to peeper (in more polite terms of course ;).  He posted an IP, but apparently at the time he was rather uneducated about IPs in general, because he didn't realize I could actually verify whether or not he was telling the truth (and I don't blame him, but tough luck ;).

I asked him if he was sure it was the Lightbringer and that it was from him entering chat and he said yes.  I pointed out that I could personally verify that he was lying.  Yet he continued to insist it (by the way, this is not the first time he's done the same thing).  As further proof that this wasn't an innocent mistake by him, another time he posted an IP that wasn't even valid (no such Ip could possibly exist because it was out of range, the four Ip segments must all be numerically under 256).  I also pointed this out, but once again he continued otherwise.  This continued for months as peeper would enter chat with various nicks, although I could usually tell it was him (after a few weeks of this peeper said to aknot: "aknot - yes the guy knows me when i come here no matter what fu*king nick i use") so you could say after that he more or less gave up that particular game. ;)

Questions are never a problem with me, I'm right now taking a break from playing Heroes of Might and Magic 3 and enjoying company. ;)



>Dear Ramses
>
>Well I guess I'll keep my mouth shut as i didn't know those facts.
>The problem wih me is I'm very emotional around young girls and sometimes I
>act like a guardian towards them(bear how I came up with the nickname)
>I know that children are quite sexual as the 11 year old I babysitted 6 times
>often talked about the wonders of sex and liked to cuddle up with me and I'll
>probably defy it as one of the greatest things.The fact that she was so
>beautiful and warming up to me.

If that is all, then the worst that will happen is someone might think you are perverted and keep their children away from you, but there won't be much more since you haven't done anything illegal (unless of course they bring false charges).  However, if you're a guy showing interest in a young girl, it gets percieved different than if you were a lady showing interest in a young girl.

>I guess its other realities but that hold me back.The fact that society
>condemns the act so i can go to jail is she should ever relate what we would
>had done on a sexual level to another.
>Hell fuck that.I'm only 20 and prison would crush me.

Well there's no reason you have to do anything illegal, to many people talking and being close to someone is enough.  Holding and being with someone isn't a sexual act unless you make it one.  Supposing you did, someone would see you as a pervert and keep their children away.  However, unless you bring false charges you can't make a case that someone broke the law by cuddling with your girl.

>There's something aboust just cuddling her too that made it so satisfying and
>complete...sure enough I was very aroused by her but just holding her was a
>moment of much happiness to me and I have heard all these theories of children
>that had sexual experiences growing up to feel shame and hatred as if they
>feel betrayed or were taken advantage of.
>i also heard an amazing fact in the paper the other day.
>An average 4 year old would be using 70% of his life intelligence.
>Perhaps we are mistaken of just how smart kids really are.

Children don't lack intelligence, mostly experience.  They can't react to new situations well, although they learn very fast compared to adults.

Personally I suggest that you be satisfied with such fantasies as fantasies but for reality you might want to think completely separately.  In reality, I'm sure you want the girl to grow up always thinking well of you and seeing your relationship as a healthy one.  If so, then do not let fantasies influence what you need to do to accomplish this.  If you think that being a father-like figure will help her mature into a healthy woman then pursue that.  However, if you are concerned whether or not a particular level of sexuality is appropriate or not, it would be best not to allow fantasies to cloud your judgement, even if you do not feel they consciously might.

As a rule of thumb, consider what child would feel in the future about a situation.  All children are different, but very few see sexual play such as masturbation in the future as shameful.  The ones that do are always made to feel that way from some other authority (such as "God" in the guise of a church).  However, most children will also see someone taking advantage of them as a shameful memory.  So, don't.

If a child asks me a question relating to sex, then I'll normally give them a straightforward and realistic answer.  However, many people would take advantage of such interest by trying to involve the child further when in reality the child is probably only curious, not necessarily interested in any sexual activity itself.

Children are always curious about things they realize that others are keeping them from knowing, no matter what it is.  Curiosity is a necessary feature to ensure that a child keeps learning until adulthood.



>I've had these paedophilic tendencies and emotions ever since 4 years ago when
>I started noticing just how arousing young girls were to me but also how drawn
>emotionally.Its like every time I pick up the newspaper to hear of another
>death of a child in one of the civil wars raging.Infact when I heard of those
>bastards that hacked those children's hands off in Africa i buried my head in
>the paper and cried but I was alone thankgod.
>Its funny as people over here were writing in to how disgusted they were to
>hear of the man getting off on child porn changes but not one response was
>from these kids that had their hands hacked off.

Most such people don't actually hate pedophiles, they merely have buried resentment in general and turn their anger towards any scapegoat they can find.  In many places they can blame minorities, other religeons, etc... and just about anyone that can't really defend themselves against persecution.  However with the world getting "politicially correct" as some say, now the only groups left are pedophiles and a few other minorities.  So, they are easily brainwashed into hating any arbitrary group based on little information about them.  This happens more times than any historian could write about.

>Its a daunting world we live in where people cannot accept differences in
>others and what others have to say in theories relating to certain topics like
>paedophilia.
>Oh well..I guess I'll always have my pics...the hobby..the site and my little
>sweet nieces to look forward for cuddles but as for staying in the shadows
>forever....well people like me will never be accepted by the majority of
>society as civilized and respectable so just call me
>Girluardian of the shadows.

People can never accept such differences because they are people.  Most don't care for facts, only for the bottom line, in many cases being whether or not persecuting someone else will benefit them.  Kids make fun of other kids to feel superior and also make sure it's someone else that's being laughed at.  Likewise when some people can't mature into rational adults, they would persecute others simply to feel superior and make sure it's someone else's beliefs that get attacked.  If you were in Nazi Germany and they were killing all the Jews around you, you might feel inclined to be on the side that lives.

No minority group has ever survived persecution without either resorting to violence (rare) or gaining strong sympathy from a large portion of the majority that results in direct action.  In this situation, the most likely scenario will be that the "pedo hunters" will be seen as zealots that don't really care about children, only for a witch to burn.  It's already happened in countries like Spain, where an attempt to raise the age of consent above 12 was struck down because the religious right was seen as being on a witch hunt.  Many people can understand an age limit, but the law would have criminalized children 12+ for sexual play (in which a large percentage of children participate in in most modern countries, legal or not).  Such a law was also rather arbitrary, as all age of consent laws are.

>Thanks for correcting me Ramses.I just wish i haven't made such a fool out of
>myself...but then again that dickhead on bbsf accusing you of a cop proves to
>be even bigger a numbskull.

The person is just sore because I pointed out that his other nick was a hypocrite by spamming the board and complaining about spam.  He's had to change his nick a ton of times because people would always laugh at his conspiricy theories and lies. ;)

As for the information about lubrication, almost any educated and active male homosexual will know, because an anus is even easier to damage than a girl's vagina.  If someone tries anal penetration without lubrication, they will quickly find out the hard way.

>Still young still learning I guess.
>Have fun with any new games you have and your cool sites.
>On the weekend Ill look into FSN too so i can put up less discreetful pics.
>
>Yours respectfully
>Girluardian.

Have fun,
Ramses ;)